[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-arc-prize-leaderboard-cost-performance-en":3,"tags-arc-prize-leaderboard-cost-performance-en":30,"related-lang-arc-prize-leaderboard-cost-performance-en":41,"related-posts-arc-prize-leaderboard-cost-performance-en":45,"series-research-7a6580cb-935a-456c-a22d-45bab79f41c9":82},{"id":4,"title":5,"content":6,"summary":7,"source":8,"source_url":9,"author":10,"image_url":11,"keywords":12,"language":18,"translated_content":10,"views":19,"is_premium":20,"created_at":21,"updated_at":21,"cover_image":11,"published_at":22,"rewrite_status":23,"rewrite_error":10,"rewritten_from_id":24,"slug":25,"category":26,"related_article_id":27,"status":28,"google_indexed_at":29,"x_posted_at":10,"tweet_text":10,"title_rewritten_at":10,"title_original":10,"key_takeaways":10,"topic_cluster_id":10,"embedding":10,"is_canonical_seed":20},"7a6580cb-935a-456c-a22d-45bab79f41c9","ARC Prize leaderboard shows cost still matters","\u003Cp>The \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Farcprize.org\u002Fleaderboard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ARC Prize leaderboard\u003C\u002Fa> is doing something a lot of AI benchmarks still avoid: it puts price next to performance. The site says only systems that cost under $10,000 to run are shown, which makes the chart feel less like a trophy wall and more like an engineering bill.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That matters because the benchmark has moved beyond passive puzzle solving. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Farcprize.org\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ARC Prize\u003C\u002Fa> says \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Farcprize.org\u002Fleaderboard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ARC-AGI-1\u003C\u002Fa> and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Farcprize.org\u002Fleaderboard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ARC-AGI-2\u003C\u002Fa> measured fluid intelligence in static settings, while \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Farcprize.org\u002Fleaderboard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ARC-AGI-3\u003C\u002Fa> asks agents to adapt inside novel interactive environments. That shift changes the question from “Can the model answer?” to “Can it learn the task fast enough to matter?”\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>What the ARC leaderboard is really measuring\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The leaderboard is built around a scatter plot that ties cost-per-task to performance. In plain English, it asks how much compute a system burns for each task and what score it gets back. That is a far more honest way to judge modern AI than raw benchmark scores, because a model that wins only after spending a fortune is hard to deploy outside a demo.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1775143857511-5rjv.png\" alt=\"ARC Prize leaderboard shows cost still matters\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>ARC Prize breaks the results into several buckets. The page explains that reasoning-system trend lines show the same model at different reasoning levels, while base LLM points show single-shot inference from systems such as \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fopenai.com\u002Findex\u002Fgpt-4-5\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">GPT-4.5\u003C\u002Fa> and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.anthropic.com\u002Fnews\u002Fclaude-3-7-sonnet\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Claude 3.7 Sonnet\u003C\u002Fa>. Kaggle systems are separate again, because they were built under a strict $50 compute budget for 120 evaluation tasks.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The result is a benchmark that rewards efficiency, restraint, and adaptation. That is a useful correction to the current AI hype cycle, where people often talk about size alone and ignore what it costs to get the answer.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Only systems under $10,000 to run appear on the leaderboard.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Kaggle entries were constrained to $50 compute for 120 evaluation tasks.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>ARC-AGI-3 tests agents in interactive environments instead of fixed puzzles.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Preview results are unofficial and may use incomplete testing.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>Why ARC-AGI-3 changes the conversation\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>ARC-AGI-3 is the most interesting part of the page because it moves the benchmark from static reasoning into interaction. A model can no longer treat the task like a one-shot exam. It has to observe, adapt, and keep up with a changing environment, which is much closer to how software agents behave in the real world.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>This is also where the cost plot becomes more than a nice visualization. If a system needs many attempts, long chains of reasoning, or heavy tool use to solve a task, the cost rises fast. ARC Prize is making that tradeoff visible, and that is exactly the kind of pressure AI labs need if they want to build systems people can actually afford.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The leaderboard notes that some results are based on partial testing or provisional pricing. That detail matters because it keeps the page from pretending the numbers are final when they are still moving. In a field where benchmark screenshots travel faster than methodology, that kind of caution is refreshing.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cblockquote>“True intelligence isn't just about solving problems, but solving them efficiently with minimal resources.”\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That line from ARC Prize gets to the heart of the benchmark. If a system can solve tasks only by spending huge amounts of compute, then the score tells you less about intelligence and more about budget tolerance. ARC Prize is trying to separate those two things.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>How the numbers compare across system types\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The leaderboard’s structure makes the comparisons more interesting than a single rank order. Reasoning systems tend to improve as they spend more time thinking, but the ARC Prize page says those trend lines usually flatten out. That asymptotic shape matters because it suggests there is a ceiling to what extra reasoning time can buy.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1775143868369-l9va.png\" alt=\"ARC Prize leaderboard shows cost still matters\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>Base LLMs, by contrast, show what a model can do without extended reasoning. They are a useful baseline because they expose raw capability. Kaggle systems are the other extreme: highly constrained, competition-tuned methods built to squeeze every bit of performance out of a tiny budget.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That gives us a practical way to read the chart. A strong result at low cost is more interesting than a higher score that needs far more compute, especially if the benchmark is meant to say something about general intelligence rather than brute-force search.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Reasoning systems show connected points for the same model at different thinking levels.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Base LLMs show single-shot inference without extended reasoning.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Kaggle systems are optimized for a fixed contest budget, not open-ended deployment.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Some entries are marked preview or provisional, so the chart is part leaderboard, part live lab notebook.\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>For readers tracking the broader AI race, this is a useful reminder that benchmark leadership and practical usefulness are different things. A model can look impressive in a chart and still be too expensive, too slow, or too brittle for real work. ARC Prize is making those tradeoffs impossible to ignore.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>If you want a useful comparison point, think about how \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fopenai.com\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OpenAI\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.anthropic.com\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Anthropic\u003C\u002Fa>, and other labs talk about reasoning models. The marketing usually centers on capability. ARC Prize adds an accountant’s eye to the mix.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>What this means for AI agents next\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The biggest takeaway from the leaderboard is simple: the next wave of AI progress will be judged on adaptation and cost, not just benchmark accuracy. That puts pressure on model makers to build systems that can reason, interact, and stop wasting tokens when the answer is already clear.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>It also makes the ARC Prize site one of the more useful public dashboards in AI right now. The combination of score, compute, and task type gives developers a better sense of what is actually improving. If ARC-AGI-3 keeps rewarding interactive competence, expect more agent frameworks to be tuned for fast recovery, fewer retries, and tighter tool use.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For anyone building with agents today, the lesson is practical: don’t measure success by the highest score alone. Measure the score per dollar, the number of attempts, and how quickly the system adapts when the task changes. That is the standard ARC Prize is pushing, and it is likely the standard more teams will adopt next.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>My bet is that the next leaderboard breakthrough will come from a system that is slightly less flashy on raw score but dramatically cheaper and faster to run. When that happens, the real question will be whether the rest of the AI industry follows the same metric or keeps chasing bigger numbers at any cost.\u003C\u002Fp>","ARC Prize’s leaderboard tracks how AI systems trade cost for score, and ARC-AGI-3 pushes agents into interactive tasks.","arcprize.org","https:\u002F\u002Farcprize.org\u002Fleaderboard",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1775143857511-5rjv.png",[13,14,15,16,17],"ARC Prize","ARC-AGI-3","AI benchmark","reasoning models","AI agents","en",0,false,"2026-04-02T15:30:39.888984+00:00","2026-04-02T15:30:39.871+00:00","done","245f25e6-76bb-4e86-88d5-0d80485ad8e0","arc-prize-leaderboard-cost-performance-en","research","ffa8459f-678e-40b9-a513-dee6b02800bc","published","2026-04-08T09:00:51.066+00:00",[31,33,35,37,39],{"name":14,"slug":32},"arc-agi-3",{"name":13,"slug":34},"arc-prize",{"name":16,"slug":36},"reasoning-models",{"name":15,"slug":38},"ai-benchmark",{"name":17,"slug":40},"ai-agents",{"id":27,"slug":42,"title":43,"language":44},"arc-prize-leaderboard-cost-performance-zh","ARC 排行榜把成本攤開來看","zh",[46,52,58,64,70,76],{"id":47,"slug":48,"title":49,"cover_image":50,"image_url":50,"created_at":51,"category":26},"94994abd-e24d-4fd1-b941-942d03d19acf","turboquant-seo-shift-small-sites-en","TurboQuant and the SEO Shift for Small Sites","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778840455122-jfce.png","2026-05-15T10:20:28.134545+00:00",{"id":53,"slug":54,"title":55,"cover_image":56,"image_url":56,"created_at":57,"category":26},"670a7f69-911f-41e8-a18b-7d3491253a19","turboquant-vllm-comparison-fp8-kv-cache-en","TurboQuant vs FP8: vLLM’s first broad test","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778839858405-b5ao.png","2026-05-15T10:10:37.219158+00:00",{"id":59,"slug":60,"title":61,"cover_image":62,"image_url":62,"created_at":63,"category":26},"5aef1c57-961f-49f7-8277-f83f7336799a","llmbda-calculus-agent-safety-rules-en","LLMbda calculus gives agents safety rules","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778825459914-obkf.png","2026-05-15T06:10:36.242145+00:00",{"id":65,"slug":66,"title":67,"cover_image":68,"image_url":68,"created_at":69,"category":26},"712a0357-f7cd-48f2-adde-c2691da0815f","low-complexity-beamspace-denoiser-mmwave-mimo-en","A simpler beamspace denoiser for mmWave MIMO","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778814646705-e7mx.png","2026-05-15T03:10:31.764301+00:00",{"id":71,"slug":72,"title":73,"cover_image":74,"image_url":74,"created_at":75,"category":26},"f595f949-6ea1-4b0e-a632-f1832ef26e36","ai-benchmark-wins-cyber-scare-defenders-en","Why AI benchmark wins in cyber should scare defenders","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778807444539-gz7f.png","2026-05-15T01:10:30.04579+00:00",{"id":77,"slug":78,"title":79,"cover_image":80,"image_url":80,"created_at":81,"category":26},"3ad202d1-9e5f-49c5-8383-02fcf1a23cf2","why-linux-security-needs-patch-wave-mindset-en","Why Linux security needs a patch-wave mindset","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778741441493-ikl6.png","2026-05-14T06:50:25.906256+00:00",[83,88,93,98,103,108,113,118,123,128],{"id":84,"slug":85,"title":86,"created_at":87},"a2715e72-1fe8-41b3-abb1-d0cf1f710189","ai-predictions-2026-big-changes-en","AI Predictions for 2026: Brace for Big Changes","2026-03-26T01:25:07.788356+00:00",{"id":89,"slug":90,"title":91,"created_at":92},"8404bd7b-4c2f-4109-9ec4-baf29d88af2b","ml-papers-of-the-week-github-research-desk-en","ML Papers of the Week Turns GitHub Into a Research Desk","2026-03-27T01:11:39.480259+00:00",{"id":94,"slug":95,"title":96,"created_at":97},"87897a94-8065-4464-a016-1f23e89e17cc","ai-ml-conferences-to-watch-in-2026-en","AI\u002FML Conferences to Watch in 2026","2026-03-27T01:51:54.184108+00:00",{"id":99,"slug":100,"title":101,"created_at":102},"6f1987cf-25f3-47a4-b3e6-db0997695be8","openclaw-agents-manipulated-self-sabotage-en","OpenClaw Agents Can Be Manipulated Into Failure","2026-03-28T03:03:18.899465+00:00",{"id":104,"slug":105,"title":106,"created_at":107},"a53571ad-735a-4178-9f93-cb09b699d99c","vega-driving-language-instructions-en","Vega: Driving with Natural Language Instructions","2026-03-28T14:54:04.698882+00:00",{"id":109,"slug":110,"title":111,"created_at":112},"a34581d6-f36e-46da-88bb-582fb3e7425c","personalizing-autonomous-driving-styles-en","Drive My Way: Personalizing Autonomous Driving Styles","2026-03-28T14:54:26.148181+00:00",{"id":114,"slug":115,"title":116,"created_at":117},"2bc1ad7f-26ce-4f02-9885-803b35fd229d","training-knowledge-bases-writeback-rag-en","Training Knowledge Bases with WriteBack-RAG","2026-03-28T14:54:45.643433+00:00",{"id":119,"slug":120,"title":121,"created_at":122},"71adc507-3c54-4605-bbe2-c966acd6187e","packforcing-long-video-generation-en","PackForcing: Efficient Long-Video Generation Method","2026-03-28T14:55:02.646943+00:00",{"id":124,"slug":125,"title":126,"created_at":127},"675942ef-b9ec-4c5f-a997-381250b6eacb","pixelsmile-facial-expression-editing-en","PixelSmile Framework Enhances Facial Expression Editing","2026-03-28T14:55:20.633463+00:00",{"id":129,"slug":130,"title":131,"created_at":132},"6954fa2b-8b66-4839-884b-e46f89fa1bc3","adaptive-block-scaled-data-types-en","IF4: Smarter 4-Bit Quantization That Adapts to Your Data","2026-03-31T06:00:36.65963+00:00"]