[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-open-source-llm-comparison-2026-en":3,"tags-open-source-llm-comparison-2026-en":30,"related-lang-open-source-llm-comparison-2026-en":42,"related-posts-open-source-llm-comparison-2026-en":46,"series-model-release-424af64f-8d0b-4cd5-b58b-f37ee073bfa1":83},{"id":4,"title":5,"content":6,"summary":7,"source":8,"source_url":9,"author":10,"image_url":11,"keywords":12,"language":18,"translated_content":10,"views":19,"is_premium":20,"created_at":21,"updated_at":21,"cover_image":11,"published_at":22,"rewrite_status":23,"rewrite_error":10,"rewritten_from_id":24,"slug":25,"category":26,"related_article_id":27,"status":28,"google_indexed_at":29,"x_posted_at":10,"tweet_text":10,"title_rewritten_at":10,"title_original":10,"key_takeaways":10,"topic_cluster_id":10,"embedding":10,"is_canonical_seed":20},"424af64f-8d0b-4cd5-b58b-f37ee073bfa1","Open Source LLMs in 2026: Who Leads?","\u003Cp>In March 2026, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcomputingforgeeks.com\u002Fopen-source-llm-comparison\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ComputingForGeeks\u003C\u002Fa> compiled a comparison that says a lot about where open large language models are headed: \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fhuggingface.co\u002FQwen\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Qwen 3.5\u003C\u002Fa> ships with a 256K context window, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.deepseek.com\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DeepSeek R1\u003C\u002Fa> hits 97.3% on MATH-500, and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhipuai.cn\u002Fen\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">GLM-5\u003C\u002Fa> posts 77.8% on SWE-bench Verified. That last number matters because it is the strongest coding benchmark result in the table.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The headline is simple: open-weight models are no longer just cheaper alternatives for hobby projects. They now compete on reasoning, coding, context length, and deployment control, while license terms decide who can actually ship them in production.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>The 2026 open model race is crowded\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>The table pulls together the major families that matter right now: Qwen 3 and 3.5, GLM-5, DeepSeek V3.2 and R1, Llama 4, Gemma 3, Mistral Large 3, Phi-4, Command A, Falcon 3, DBRX, and Grok-1. That is already a lot of surface area, and the differences are not cosmetic.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1775131810853-8ewo.png\" alt=\"Open Source LLMs in 2026: Who Leads?\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>Alibaba’s \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fhuggingface.co\u002FQwen\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Qwen\u003C\u002Fa> line is the most flexible on paper. The flagship Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B uses only 17B active parameters per token, which is a big deal if you care about inference cost. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdeepseek-ai\u002FDeepSeek-R1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DeepSeek R1\u003C\u002Fa> takes a different route, using a 671B MoE design with 37B active parameters and a strong reasoning focus. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fai.meta.com\u002Fllama\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Meta’s Llama 4\u003C\u002Fa> pushes context length hard, with Scout at 10M tokens and Maverick at 1M tokens.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The practical takeaway is that model choice now depends on what you are building, not just on who tops a leaderboard. A coding assistant, a research tool, and a long-context document system will not value the same tradeoffs.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Qwen 3.5: 256K context, text + image, Apache 2.0\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>GLM-5: 205K context, text + image, MIT\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>DeepSeek V3.2: 128K context, MIT\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Llama 4 Maverick: 1M context, Llama 4 Community license\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Mistral Small 4: 256K context, Apache 2.0\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>Benchmarks tell a clearer story than marketing\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Benchmarks still do the heavy lifting here. The table uses MMLU, MMLU-Pro, GPQA Diamond, AIME ’24, MATH-500, and SWE-bench Verified, which gives a decent spread across general knowledge, harder reasoning, math, and coding.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Two numbers jump out immediately. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fhuggingface.co\u002FQwen\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Qwen 3 235B\u003C\u002Fa> leads on GPQA Diamond at 77.2% and AIME ’24 at 85.7%, which makes it the strongest open-weight model for reasoning and math in this set. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdeepseek-ai\u002FDeepSeek-R1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DeepSeek R1\u003C\u002Fa> dominates MATH-500 at 97.3%, which is near-perfect for that benchmark. Then \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhipuai.cn\u002Fen\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">GLM-5\u003C\u002Fa> lands at 77.8% on SWE-bench Verified, the best coding score listed.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cblockquote>“We are seeing open models catch up fast in both quality and efficiency.” — Satya Nadella, Microsoft Build 2024 keynote\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Cp>That quote aged well. It fits this table because the gap is no longer about whether open models can perform; it is about which model performs best for a specific job and under what license.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>One more detail matters: \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fai.meta.com\u002Fllama\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Llama 4 Maverick\u003C\u002Fa> posts the highest raw MMLU score in the table at 85.5%, but MMLU alone does not capture deep reasoning or coding skill. If you only chase one benchmark, you will probably pick the wrong model.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Qwen 3 235B: 83.6% MMLU-Pro, 77.2% GPQA Diamond, 85.7% AIME ’24\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>DeepSeek R1: 84.0% MMLU-Pro, 71.5% GPQA Diamond, 97.3% MATH-500\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>GLM-5: 77.8% SWE-bench Verified\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Llama 4 Maverick: 85.5% MMLU\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Gemma 3 27B: 78.6% MMLU, 50.0% MATH-500\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>Licenses decide what you can ship\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>This is where the article gets practical. The best model on paper may be the wrong model for a startup, a regulated enterprise, or a product that expects to scale past a few hundred million users.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"my-6\">\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1775131797002-16vt.png\" alt=\"Open Source LLMs in 2026: Who Leads?\" class=\"rounded-xl w-full\" loading=\"lazy\" \u002F>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FQwenLM\u002FQwen\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Qwen\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdeepseek-ai\u002FDeepSeek-R1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DeepSeek\u003C\u002Fa>, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.zhipuai.cn\u002Fen\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">GLM-5\u003C\u002Fa>, and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fmistral.ai\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mistral\u003C\u002Fa> now give developers some of the cleanest paths to commercial use. Apache 2.0 and MIT are the licenses most teams want to see when they plan to fine-tune, self-host, and sell a product without extra legal drama.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The picture changes with \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fai.meta.com\u002Fllama\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Meta’s Llama\u003C\u002Fa> family and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fai.google.dev\u002Fgemma\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google’s Gemma\u003C\u002Fa>. Llama 4 and Llama 3.3 are free under a 700M monthly active users threshold, but large deployments need to pay attention to Meta’s terms. Gemma permits commercial use after accepting Google’s terms. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cohere.com\u002Fcommand\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cohere’s Command\u003C\u002Fa> models are non-commercial under CC-BY-NC. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.tii.ae\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">TII’s Falcon 3\u003C\u002Fa> adds a revenue-based royalty clause above $1M.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That means the “best” model is often the one your legal team can sign off on quickly.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Apache 2.0: Qwen 3\u002F3.5, Mistral Large 3, Mistral Small 4, Mixtral 8x7B, Grok-1\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>MIT: DeepSeek V3\u002FR1\u002FV3.2, Phi-4 variants, GLM-5\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Llama 4 Community: free under 700M MAU, then Meta terms apply\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>CC-BY-NC: Command R+ and Command A, no commercial deployment without separate terms\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Databricks Open Model: DBRX cannot be used to train other LLMs\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>Self-hosting changes the ranking in real life\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Benchmarks are one thing. Running the model on your own machine is another. The article’s Ollama tests used Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, 4 vCPUs, 16 GB RAM, and CPU-only inference, which is a pretty honest baseline for people who want local deployment without a GPU farm.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The results are revealing. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Follama.com\u002F\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ollama\u003C\u002Fa> ran \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fai.google.dev\u002Fgemma\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Gemma 3 4B\u003C\u002Fa> using just 4.2 GB of RAM, making it the most memory-friendly option in the test. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fhuggingface.co\u002Fmeta-llama\u002FLlama-3.2-3B\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Llama 3.2 3B\u003C\u002Fa> was the fastest at 88 seconds, but it used 11.4 GB of RAM. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdeepseek-ai\u002FDeepSeek-R1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DeepSeek R1 8B\u003C\u002Fa> and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fhuggingface.co\u002FQwen\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Qwen 3 8B\u003C\u002Fa> both took 433 seconds because reasoning-heavy models generate more intermediate tokens before answering.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That CPU test is a reminder that “small” does not always mean “fast,” and “smart” often costs time. For local use, memory footprint and response latency matter as much as benchmark scores.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>Gemma 3 4B: 4.2 GB RAM, 94s response time\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Llama 3.2 3B: 11.4 GB RAM, 88s response time\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Phi-4 Mini 3.8B: 8.9 GB RAM, 97s response time\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Mistral 7B: 7.4 GB RAM, 125s response time\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>Qwen 3 8B and DeepSeek R1 8B: 433s each on CPU\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Ch2>What I would pick today\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>If I were shipping a product this quarter, I would start with Qwen 3.5 for general-purpose work, DeepSeek R1 for reasoning-heavy tasks, and GLM-5 for coding workloads where SWE-bench matters more than brand familiarity. That is the short version.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The longer version is that open model selection in 2026 is less about “which model is best” and more about “which model fits the job, the hardware, and the license.” Teams with strict compliance needs will keep preferring Apache 2.0 or MIT. Teams that need long context will keep watching Llama 4, Qwen 3.5, and Mistral Large 3. Teams that care about coding should look hard at GLM-5 and then verify it on their own repos.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The next question is not whether open models can compete with closed ones. It is whether your stack is ready to swap models quickly when a better one appears next month. If your answer is no, that is the real bottleneck.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For a practical next step, compare these models against your own prompts, your own latency targets, and your own license constraints before you commit. That will tell you more than any leaderboard ever will.\u003C\u002Fp>","Qwen 3.5, GLM-5, DeepSeek R1, and Llama 4 now push open models into serious production territory, with licensing still deciding deployments.","computingforgeeks.com","https:\u002F\u002Fcomputingforgeeks.com\u002Fopen-source-llm-comparison\u002F",null,"https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1775131810853-8ewo.png",[13,14,15,16,17],"open-source LLMs","Qwen 3.5","DeepSeek R1","GLM-5","Llama 4","en",1,false,"2026-04-02T12:09:40.211772+00:00","2026-04-02T12:09:40.071+00:00","done","31b7d763-4c00-4105-9280-4352d203861b","open-source-llm-comparison-2026-en","model-release","710ff4cc-d333-4bd8-b50a-e5522d430161","published","2026-04-08T09:00:52.365+00:00",[31,33,36,38,40],{"name":17,"slug":32},"llama-4",{"name":34,"slug":35},"DeepSeek-R1","deepseek-r1",{"name":14,"slug":37},"qwen-35",{"name":13,"slug":39},"open-source-llms",{"name":16,"slug":41},"glm-5",{"id":27,"slug":43,"title":44,"language":45},"open-source-llm-comparison-2026-zh","2026 開源 LLM 誰領先","zh",[47,53,59,65,71,77],{"id":48,"slug":49,"title":50,"cover_image":51,"image_url":51,"created_at":52,"category":26},"ebd0ef7f-f14d-4e25-a54e-073b49f9d4b9","why-googles-hidden-gemini-live-models-matter-en","Why Google’s Hidden Gemini Live Models Matter More Than the Demo","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778869237748-4rqx.png","2026-05-15T18:20:23.999239+00:00",{"id":54,"slug":55,"title":56,"cover_image":57,"image_url":57,"created_at":58,"category":26},"6c57f6bf-1023-4a22-a6c0-013bd88ac3d1","minimax-m1-open-hybrid-attention-reasoning-model-en","MiniMax-M1 brings 1M-token open reasoning model","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778797872005-z8uk.png","2026-05-14T22:30:39.599473+00:00",{"id":60,"slug":61,"title":62,"cover_image":63,"image_url":63,"created_at":64,"category":26},"68a2ba2e-f07a-4f28-a69c-24bf66652d2e","gemini-omni-video-review-text-rendering-en","Gemini Omni Video Review: Text Rendering Beats Rivals","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778779286834-fy35.png","2026-05-14T17:20:44.524502+00:00",{"id":66,"slug":67,"title":68,"cover_image":69,"image_url":69,"created_at":70,"category":26},"1d5fc6b1-a87f-48ae-89ee-e5f0da86eb2d","why-xiaomi-mimo-v25-pro-changes-coding-agents-en","Why Xiaomi’s MiMo-V2.5-Pro Changes Coding Agents More Than Chatbots","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778689848027-ocpw.png","2026-05-13T16:30:29.661993+00:00",{"id":72,"slug":73,"title":74,"cover_image":75,"image_url":75,"created_at":76,"category":26},"cb3eac19-4b8d-4ee0-8f7e-d3c2f0b50af5","openai-realtime-audio-models-live-voice-en","OpenAI’s Realtime Audio Models Target Live Voice","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778451653257-dsnq.png","2026-05-10T22:20:33.31082+00:00",{"id":78,"slug":79,"title":80,"cover_image":81,"image_url":81,"created_at":82,"category":26},"84c630af-a060-4b6b-9af2-1b16de0c8f06","anthropic-10-finance-ai-agents-en","Anthropic发布10款金融AI Agent","https:\u002F\u002Fxxdpdyhzhpamafnrdkyq.supabase.co\u002Fstorage\u002Fv1\u002Fobject\u002Fpublic\u002Fcovers\u002Finline-1778389841959-ktkf.png","2026-05-10T05:10:23.345141+00:00",[84,89,94,99,104,109,114,119,124,129],{"id":85,"slug":86,"title":87,"created_at":88},"d4cffde7-9b50-4cc7-bb68-8bc9e3b15477","nvidia-rubin-ai-supercomputer-en","NVIDIA Unveils Rubin: A Leap in AI Supercomputing","2026-03-25T16:24:35.155565+00:00",{"id":90,"slug":91,"title":92,"created_at":93},"eab919b9-fbac-4048-89fc-afad6749ccef","google-gemini-ai-innovations-2026-en","Google's AI Leap with Gemini Innovations in 2026","2026-03-25T16:27:18.841838+00:00",{"id":95,"slug":96,"title":97,"created_at":98},"5f5cfc67-3384-4816-a8f6-19e44d90113d","gap-google-gemini-ai-checkout-en","Gap Teams Up with Google Gemini for AI-Driven Checkout","2026-03-25T16:27:46.483272+00:00",{"id":100,"slug":101,"title":102,"created_at":103},"f6d04567-47f6-49ec-804c-52e61ab91225","ai-model-release-wave-march-2026-en","Navigating the AI Model Release Wave of March 2026","2026-03-25T16:28:45.409716+00:00",{"id":105,"slug":106,"title":107,"created_at":108},"895c150c-569e-4fdf-939d-dade785c990e","small-language-models-transform-ai-en","Small Language Models: Llama 3.2 and Phi-3 Transform AI","2026-03-25T16:30:26.688313+00:00",{"id":110,"slug":111,"title":112,"created_at":113},"38eb1d26-d961-4fd3-ae12-9c4089680f5f","midjourney-v8-alpha-features-pricing-en","Midjourney V8 Alpha: A Deep Dive into Its Features and Pricing","2026-03-26T01:25:36.387587+00:00",{"id":115,"slug":116,"title":117,"created_at":118},"bf36bb9e-3444-4fb8-ab19-0df6bc9d8271","rag-2026-indispensable-ai-bridge-en","RAG in 2026: The Indispensable AI Bridge","2026-03-26T01:28:34.472046+00:00",{"id":120,"slug":121,"title":122,"created_at":123},"60881d6d-2310-44ef-b1fb-7f98e9dd2f0e","xiaomi-mimo-trio-agents-robots-voice-en","Xiaomi’s MiMo trio targets agents, robots, and voice","2026-03-28T03:05:08.899895+00:00",{"id":125,"slug":126,"title":127,"created_at":128},"f063d8d1-41d1-4de4-8ebc-6c40511b9369","xiaomi-mimo-v2-pro-1t-moe-agents-en","Xiaomi MiMo-V2-Pro: 1T MoE Model for Agents","2026-03-28T03:06:19.238032+00:00",{"id":130,"slug":131,"title":132,"created_at":133},"a1379e9a-6785-4ff5-9b0a-8cff55f8264f","cursor-composer-2-started-from-kimi-en","Cursor’s Composer 2 started from Kimi","2026-03-28T03:11:59.132398+00:00"]